Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - aquisillo

Pages: [1]
1
Switches / evpn-vxlan on MX
« on: March 30, 2016, 12:55:10 pm »
Dear members,

I am trying to configure a evpn-vxlan transport between 2 MX but I cannot establish vtep.

Does anyone has already tried that or give me some suggest?

Thanks
Antonio

2
Routers / CoS Base Forwarding and VRF
« on: September 22, 2014, 08:05:26 am »
Dear All,

I wish to set-up a CBF for a VRF instance in order to choose a specific LSP when different kind of flow ingress the vrf interface.
I tryed in my lab without success.

I have attached the lab schema and configuration.
 
Could anyone give me some help, please?

Best regards

Antonio

3
Routers / M10-i RPM icmp probe with VRRP source-address
« on: May 02, 2013, 09:46:05 am »
Dear All,

is it possible to config as source address for an icmp RPM probe a vrrp ip address?

Thanks in advice

Antonio

4
SRX Platform and J-series / srx series source nat pool reveiced by eBGP
« on: January 30, 2013, 02:38:29 pm »
Dear All,

is it possible to have a src nat translation with IP pool that is not bound to an interface but it is received by externel BGP?

Many thanks

5
Routers / OSPF SDH interface
« on: November 20, 2012, 02:06:52 am »
Hi all,

my name is Antonio and I am new in the forum. I have this situation:


# show protocols ospf   
traffic-engineering;
reference-bandwidth 100g;
area 0.0.0.0 {
    interface lo0.0 {
        passive;
    }
    interface so-1/2/1.0 {
        interface-type p2p;
        metric 1;
        bfd-liveness-detection {
            minimum-interval 300;
            multiplier 3;
        }
    }
    interface ge-1/1/1.0 {
        interface-type p2p;
        metric 1;
        bfd-liveness-detection {
            minimum-interval 300;
            multiplier 3;
        }
    }

run show interfaces terse so-1/2/1 
Interface               Admin Link Proto    Local                 Remote
so-1/2/1                up    up 
so-1/2/1.0              up    up   inet     10.130.1.141/30
                                   inet6    fe80::aad0:e514:452:cf37/64
                                   mpls   

run show route 10.130.1.140   

inet.0: 426 destinations, 427 routes (426 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both

10.130.1.140/30    *[Direct/0] 16:21:23
                    > via so-1/2/1.0
                    [OSPF/10] 16:21:23, metric 1
                    > via so-1/2/1.0

run show ospf interface so-1/2/1.0 extensive   
Interface           State   Area            DR ID           BDR ID          Nbrs
so-1/2/1.0          PtToPt  0.0.0.0         0.0.0.0         0.0.0.0            1
  Type: P2P, Address: 0.0.0.0, Mask: 0.0.0.0, MTU: 4484, Cost: 1
  Adj count: 1
  Hello: 10, Dead: 40, ReXmit: 5, Not Stub
  Auth type: None
  Protection type: None
  Topology default (ID 0) -> Cost: 1
so-1/2/1.0          PtToPt  0.0.0.0         0.0.0.0         0.0.0.0            0
  Type: P2P, Address: 10.130.1.141, Mask: 255.255.255.252, MTU: 4484, Cost: 1
  Adj count: 0, Passive
  Hello: 10, Dead: 40, ReXmit: 5, Not Stub
  Auth type: None
  Protection type: None
  Topology default (ID 0) -> Passive, Cost: 1


why this happens? why I see a direct connected lan also in ospf? why I have two sdh listed in the ospf?

Thanks in advance

Pages: [1]