JuniperForum.com
March 10, 2010, 12:40:44 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: If you have an interesting idea for an article or knowledgebase entry, please submit it!
 
  Home Help Login Register  
* *
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: VPN (Policy Based) not working after HA configured (Active Passive)  (Read 699 times)
knizamm
Newbie
*
Posts: 3


View Profile
« on: September 02, 2009, 09:44:47 AM »

Hi guys... i've encountered a problem. When running single SRX3600, the VPN is working fine. After i configure chassis cluster with another unit of SRX3600, it seems that the VPN can't be established even it is phase 1. The difference is in cluster mode, i've configured 2 physical trust interfaces into single redundant interface and 2 physical untrust interfaces into single redundant interface. FYI, other fw function is working fine except VPN. I'm running 9.6R1.13.
Logged
screenie.
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1235


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2009, 11:59:28 AM »


Hi,

what does show log kmdlog tells you about what's going wrong?
Logged

Regards, Screenie
------------------------
JNSS, JNCIA, JNCIS, JNCI
knizamm
Newbie
*
Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2009, 02:19:49 PM »

Hi screenie,

Nothing much....

Aug 24 16:00:42 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 24 16:07:05 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 25 09:59:08 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 25 10:02:24 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 27 21:50:41 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 27 21:52:21 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 27 21:52:56 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 27 21:53:56 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 27 21:55:16 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 27 21:56:23 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 27 21:56:51 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 27 21:57:58 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 27 21:58:14 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 27 22:21:55 KMD_INTERNAL_ERROR: Error:File exists in adding SA config for tunnel id 4 spi 0
Aug 27 22:36:36 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 27 22:37:07 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 28 11:06:39 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Aug 28 12:13:26 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 09:51:03 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 09:51:23 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 09:52:03 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 09:56:59 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 09:58:06 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 09:58:38 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 09:59:29 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 10:00:30 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 10:00:43 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 10:01:32 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 10:01:53 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 10:02:34 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 10:03:12 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 10:03:26 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 10:03:55 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 10:04:24 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 14:09:53 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 14:18:23 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 14:18:57 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 15:23:05 KMD_INTERNAL_ERROR: Exit at kmd_process_die_peacefully 744
Sep  2 16:42:29 Group/Shared IKE ID VPN configured: 0
Sep  2 16:42:29 Obsolete parameter length_of_local_secret is not set to zero in ssh_ike_init
Sep  2 16:42:29 Obsolete parameter token_hash_type is not set to zero in ssh_ike_init

My concern is when running single fw, the vpn initiated and reply at the same physical interface which is working fine but in cluster mode, the initiated from virtual interface (reth0) and reply going to physical interface. Kindly advise.

Thanks.
Logged
screenie.
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1235


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2009, 02:28:11 PM »

But did you specify reth0 as outgoing interface?
Logged

Regards, Screenie
------------------------
JNSS, JNCIA, JNCIS, JNCI
knizamm
Newbie
*
Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2009, 02:52:27 PM »

Yup, have change it from ge-0/0/0 to reth0. From Juniper docs, it specified reth0.0. Is there any difference?

        proposal toEDC {
            authentication-method pre-shared-keys;
            dh-group group2;
            authentication-algorithm md5;
            encryption-algorithm 3des-cbc;
            lifetime-seconds 86400;
        }
        policy toEDC {
            mode main;
            proposals toEDC;
        }
        gateway toEDC {
            ike-policy toEDC;
            address 192.228.122.101;
            external-interface reth0;
        }
Logged
dawsonpaul
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2009, 04:49:47 PM »

knizamm - did you manage to sort this?
Logged
stolmik
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2010, 09:04:41 AM »

hi
i have the same issue but with route-based vpn. reth0.0 on clustered srx3400 don't see any ike\ipsec packets at all! neither incoming nor outgoing. i created a case in JTAC. so let's see what they find out.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Navigation

Donate

Please consider donating if we've saved you time or money. It helps pay for the bandwidth, equipment, and hosting charges to keep this site running

Tools

Submit Article/KB - Do not submit questions here.

Recent

Stats

Members
  • Total Members: 20486
  • Latest: Snok
Stats
  • Total Posts: 38002
  • Total Topics: 9817
  • Online Today: 65
  • Online Ever: 393
  • (August 06, 2008, 07:40:57 AM)
Users Online
Users: 2
Guests: 46
Total: 48
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.227 seconds with 39 queries.